TANZANIA VP RESIGNS AMID SPECULATION OVER STRAIN WITH PRESIDENT SULUHU
RUTO, GACHAGUA DRAW THE LINE ON 2027 DEAL
TREVOR, DJ SHITI TRADE BARBS OVER HEHA MOVERS MANAGEMENT
IEBC BANS CAMPAIGNS BEFORE MAY 29, 2027
Ndindi Nyoro joins opposition after UDA exit
RONALDO AND GEORGINA FLAUNT WEDDING RINGS
DIAMOND’S FORMER DJ RESCUED FROM STREETS
MUTURI REJECTS GACHAGUA’S ‘HYENA COALITION’
YUNGE’S ALLEGED EX CRIES FOUL AFTER CHARLENE’S WEDDING
A fresh legal battle has been launched to remove National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula, with petitioners accusing him of defying court orders by declaring Kenya Kwanza the majority party.
The petition, led by Kenneth Njagi Njiru, urges the High Court to rule that Wetang’ula is unfit to serve as Speaker. The group argues that he ignored a previous court judgment by insisting that Azimio la Umoja One Kenya Coalition Party remains the minority party in the National Assembly.
The petitioners want the court to declare all parliamentary proceedings conducted after the judgment null and void. They also seek a ruling that bars Wetang’ula from continuing as Speaker unless he resigns from his leadership roles in Ford Kenya and Kenya Kwanza.
Just a week ago, the National Assembly dismissed another attempt to censure Wetang’ula. The Grassroot Oversight Initiative had sought to challenge his leadership, but Parliament Clerk Samuel Njoroge shut down the effort, stating that only a Member of Parliament can initiate such a motion.
“We have reviewed the Constitution, the Petition to Parliament (Procedure) Act, 2012, and the National Assembly Standing Orders. Standing Order 87(1) stipulates that the Speaker’s conduct can only be discussed through a substantive motion with at least three days’ notice,” Njoroge wrote.
Laban Omusundi, executive director of the Grassroot Civilian Oversight Initiative, had petitioned Parliament, urging MPs to initiate a motion against Wetang’ula. However, with the Clerk’s response, the effort hit a dead end.
Omusundi accused Wetang’ula of engaging in political activities that compromise the neutrality expected of his office, a role that should remain independent of partisan influence.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!